United States of America v. Oscar Alonso Robles-Salinas

13-50067Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 de mar. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OSCAR ALONSO ROBLES-SALINAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-50067
D.C. No. 3:12-cr-03464-LAB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 10, 2014**
Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Alonso Robles-Salinas appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
importation of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
MAR 13 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Robles-Salinas contends that the district court erred by denying his request
for a minor role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). He argues that the court
erred by (i) improperly considering his lack of candor with the probation officer,
(ii) engaging in speculation about the type and amount of drugs involved in a prior
smuggling venture, and (iii) giving undue consideration to the amount of drugs
involved in the instant offense. Contrary to Robles-Salinas’s contention, the court
properly considered the totality of the circumstances in making its minor role
determination. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(C). Moreover, because Robles-
Salinas failed to prove that he was substantially less culpable than the average
participant in the offense, the district court did not clearly err by denying the
adjustment. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 cmt. n.3(A); United States v. Rodriguez-Castro,
641 F.3d 1189, 1192-93 (9th Cir. 2011).
AFFIRMED.
13-50067 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.