United States of America v. Oscar Alejandro Garcia- Luquin

13-10215Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit26 de fev. de 2014

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
OSCAR ALEJANDRO GARCIA-
LUQUIN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10215
D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00304-LDG
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2014**
Before: ALARCÓN, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Alejandro Garcia-Luquin appeals from the district court’s judgment
and challenges the 40-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea
conviction for being a deported alien found unlawfully in the United States, in
FILED
FEB 26 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we vacate and remand for resentencing.
Garcia-Luquin contends that the district court erred by failing to recognize
its discretion to vary downward from the Guidelines range to account for the
government’s failure to move for a third-level reduction for acceptance of
responsibility. Effective November 1, 2013, U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 was amended to
clarify that “[t]he government should not withhold [a motion for reduction for
acceptance of responsibility] based on interests not identified in § 3E1.1, such as
whether the defendant agrees to waive his or her right to appeal.” U.S.S.G.
§ 3E1.1 cmt. n.6. The government concedes, and we agree, that Garcia-Luquin is
entitled to a new sentencing hearing at which the government will move for the
third level.
In light of our decision, we do not reach Garcia-Luquin’s contention that the
40-month sentence is substantively unreasonable.
VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.
13-10215 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.