12-10449•United States of America v. Carlos Bartolon-Lopez, a.k.a. Anthony Felix-Lopez
12-10449Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit4 de dez. de 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CARLOS BARTOLON-LOPEZ, a.k.a.
Anthony Felix-Lopez,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 12-10449
12-10450
D.C. Nos. 4:11-cr-50292-DCB
4:11-cr-03821-DCB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 19, 2013**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Carlos Bartolon-Lopez appeals his guilty-plea
conviction and 77-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and concurrent eight-
FILED
DEC 04 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Bartolon-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Bartolon-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
12-10449 & 12-10450 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.