Saul Alfredo Lujan-Suarez, a.k.a. Manuel Suarez-Suares v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SAUL ALFREDO LUJAN-SUAREZ,
a.k.a. Manuel Suarez-Suares,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-72615
Agency No. A090-526-353
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 15, 2013**
Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Saul Alfredo Lujan-Suarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his
appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We dismiss the petition for
review.
FILED
OCT 25 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Lujan-Suarez does not challenge the BIA’s determination that he is
removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(C) due to his conviction for misconduct
involving weapons under Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-3102. His removability
on this basis limits our jurisdiction to constitutional claims and questions of law.
See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C)-(D).
Lujan-Suarez’s assertion that he has resided in the United States since
childhood is not a sufficiently colorable claim to invoke our jurisdiction under
8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930
(9th Cir. 2005) (“To be colorable in this context, the [question of law] need not be
substantial, but the claim must have some possible validity.” (citation and internal
quotation marks omitted)).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
11-72615 2

-- 2 of 2 --