United States of America v. Ramiro Lopez-Diaz

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAMIRO LOPEZ-DIAZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10591
D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01516-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 15, 2013**
Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Ramiro Lopez-Diaz appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the revocation of supervised release and the 12-month sentence imposed
upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Lopez-Diaz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,
FILED
OCT 22 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10591 2
along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Lopez-Diaz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --