Kajneesh Jaret v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KAJNEESH JARET,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-70447
Agency No. A088-664-706
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 24, 2013**
Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Kajneesh Jaret, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the
FILED
SEP 27 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-70447 2
agency’s factual findings, Rahimzadeh v. Holder, 613 F.3d 916, 920 (9th Cir.
2010), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding of removal
because Jaret failed to demonstrate that the Indian government is unwilling or
unable to control the Muslim extremists he fears. See Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399
F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2005) (although police were unable to solve crimes
against petitioner, evidence did not compel finding that crimes were committed by
forces the government was unable or unwilling to control because police took
reports and investigated petitioner’s complaints); Rahimzadeh, 613 F.3d at 923
(country report did not support conclusion that government was unwilling or
unable to control petitioner’s attackers).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --