United States of America v. Eugenio Arreola-Jimenez, a.k.a. Leonel Jimenez, a.k.a. Jose Perez, a.k.a. Otto…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EUGENIO ARREOLA-JIMENEZ, a.k.a.
Leonel Jimenez, a.k.a. Jose Perez, a.k.a.
Otto Vasquez, a.k.a. Trinidad Rios
Zamora,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-50454
D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00556-PA-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 1, 2013 **
Before: GRABER, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Eugenio Arreola-Jimenez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
FILED
AUG 20 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-50454 2
challenges the 77-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation
of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Arreola contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to
properly consider his argument for leniency based on the extreme poverty of his
childhood. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608
F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Arreola’s 77-
month sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The
within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.
§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --