United States of America v. Teresa Martinez Martinez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TERESA MARTINEZ MARTINEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10487
D.C. No. 1:08-cr-00087-AWI
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 24, 2013**
Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Teresa Martinez Martinez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 264-month sentence imposed following her jury-trial conviction for
conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 846; and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in
FILED
AUG 01 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10487 2
violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Martinez Martinez contends that her sentence is substantively unreasonable.
She argues that the court should have varied downward from the Guidelines on
policy grounds, and that its failure to do so resulted in a sentence that was greater
than necessary. The record reflects that Martinez Martinez’s sentence, five years
below the advisory Guidelines range is substantively reasonable in light of the
totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors. See
Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Moreover, the court varied
downward based on Martinez Martinez’s mitigating factors, but was not obligated
to vary on policy grounds where it did not express any policy disagreement with
the Guidelines or their treatment of Martinez Martinez. See United States v.
Henderson, 649 F.3d 955, 964 (9th Cir. 2011).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --