Adrian Rodarte-Rodarte v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADRIAN RODARTE-RODARTE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-71600
Agency No. A076-659-665
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 18, 2013**
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Adrian Rodarte-Rodarte, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal and denial of his request for a
continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
JUN 20 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

06-71600 2
discretion the agency’s denial of a continuance, Ahmed v. Holder, 569 F.3d 1009,
1012 (9th Cir. 2009), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodarte-Rodarte’s
request for a second continuance for failure to show good cause where he had
already been granted a continuance for the purpose of applying for humanitarian
reinstatement of his visa petition but had failed to do so during the continuance
period. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (IJ may grant a motion for a continuance for good
cause shown); Ahmed, 569 F.3d at 1012.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --