Andrea B. Gale, an individual v. Citimortgage, Inc.;

13-15125Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit19 de jun. de 2013

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREA B. GALE, an individual, and as
Trustee of Andrea Beryl Gale Revocable
Living Trust,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-15125
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02065-GMN-
VCF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 17, 2013**
Before: HAWKINS, GOULD, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Andrea Gale appeals the district court’s denial of her request for preliminary
injunctive relief against Citimortgage, Inc. and other mortgage entities. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
FILED
JUN 19 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

13-15125 2
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in denying
preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude that the district court did not abuse
its discretion. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24
(2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United
Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of
review).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.