Francisca Aguilar Rocha v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANCISCA AGUILAR ROCHA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73813
Agency No. A078-638-837
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 18, 2013 **
San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, FARRIS, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Rocha petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s denial of
her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b) and we deny
the petition.
FILED
JAN 23 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
The Board did not abuse its discretion because it gave a reasoned basis for
its decision by stating correctly that Rocha had submitted no evidence showing that
she had a well-founded fear of persecution or that she faces a clear probability of
torture. See Konstantinova v. I.N.S., 195 F.3d 528, 529 (9th Cir. 1999).
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --