Leda Odeth Hernandez Velasquez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEDA ODETH HERNANDEZ
VELASQUEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-70637
Agency No. A078-197-977
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 15, 2013**
Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Leda Odeth Hernandez Velasquez, a native and citizen of Honduras,
petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision. We have jurisdiction
FILED
JAN 16 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-70637 2
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Young v. Holder,
697 F.3d 976, 981 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc). “When the BIA summarily affirms
the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency action.” Zehatye
v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for
review.
The IJ did not err in concluding that Hernandez Velasquez was ineligible for
cancellation of removal where the conviction record was inconclusive as to the
controlled substance involved in her conviction. See Young, 697 F.3d at 990 (“A
petitioner cannot carry the burden of demonstrating eligibility for cancellation of
removal by establishing an inconclusive record of conviction.”).
Hernandez Velasquez’s remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --