Mayra Lorena Alvarado- Castillo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

11-73017Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 de nov. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MAYRA LORENA ALVARADO-
CASTILLO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-73017
Agency No. A094-917-054
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 13, 2012 **
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Mayra Lorena Alvarado-Castillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
denying her motion to reconsider the underlying denial of her applications for
FILED
NOV 16 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-73017 2
asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
Alvarado-Castillo contends that the BIA did not properly consider the
persecution she suffered in the past, and fears in the future, in El Salvador. The
BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Alvarado-Castillo’s motion to
reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the
BIA’s prior decision upholding the denial of petitioner’s applications for relief.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.