Judy Tjahjadi Kustanto v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUDY TJAHJADI KUSTANTO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-71201
Agency No. A079-538-687
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 13, 2012**
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Judy Tjahjadi Kustanto, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to
reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
FILED
NOV 16 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-71201 2
review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v.
Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Kustanto’s motion to reopen
as untimely where it was filed almost five years after the BIA’s final order, see
8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Kustanto did not demonstrate changed circumstances
in Indonesia to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for filing
motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987
(new evidence must be qualitatively different from the evidence presented at the
prior proceeding to be material).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --