Maria De Jesus Alvarado Contreras v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA DE JESUS ALVARADO
CONTRERAS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-70550
Agency No. A095-449-381
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 10, 2012**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Maria De Jesus Alvarado Contreras, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her
motion to reconsider its previous order denying her motion to reopen removal
FILED
SEP 17 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-70550 2
proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d
785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Alvarado Contreras’ motion
to reconsider because she failed to establish any error in its prior determination that
she had not established the due diligence necessary for equitable tolling of the
filing deadline for motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1); Avagyan v.
Holder, 646 F.3d 672, 678-80 (9th Cir. 2011).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --