United States of America v. GERARDO IBARRA-RAMIREZ, AKA Javier Hernandez-Hernandez, AKA Javier Gustavo…

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GERARDO IBARRA-RAMIREZ, AKA
Javier Hernandez-Hernandez, AKA Javier
Gustavo Hernandez-Hernandez, AKA
Javier Hernandez-Reyes,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10352
D.C. No. 4:11-cr-00138-CKJ-JJM-
1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 15, 2012 **
Before: CANBY, GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
FILED
MAY 17 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

Gerardo Ibarra-Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and
70–month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ibarra-Ramirez’s counsel
has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to
file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief
has been filed.
Our independent review of the available record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80–81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct
appeal.
Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --