United States of America v. Francisco Miguel Angel Najera-Gordillo, a.k.a. Miguel Angel Gonzalez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
FRANCISCO MIGUEL ANGEL
NAJERA-GORDILLO, a.k.a. Miguel
Angel Gonzalez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10006
D.C. No. 2:05-cr-00383-EJG
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Edward J. Garcia, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Francisco Miguel Angel Najera-Gordillo appeals from the 324-month
sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to distribute
FILED
MAR 05 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10006 2
and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§§ 846 and 841(a)(1), and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine,
in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
Najera-Gordillo contends that the sentence imposed is substantively
unreasonable. The record reflects that the district court considered Najera-
Gordillo’s arguments in mitigation and provided a well-reasoned analysis of the 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors, before concluding that a sentence at the
bottom of the Guidelines range was appropriate. The sentence is substantively
reasonable under the totality of the circumstances and in light of the section
3553(a) sentencing factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --