United States of America v. Pamela D. Meza

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PAMELA D. MEZA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-10047
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00047-JCM-PAL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
The United States appeals the district court’s order reducing the criminal
forfeiture money judgment against Pamela D. Meza. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291.
FILED
FEB 24 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10047 2
In light of our holding in United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir.
2011), we vacate the district court’s order reducing Meza’s criminal forfeiture
money judgment to $298,646.00, and we remand.
VACATED and REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --