United States of America v. Brian K. Jackson

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRIAN K. JACKSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-10014
D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00438-JCM-RJJ
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHANNON PARSONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-10015
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00299-JCM-LRL
FILED
FEB 24 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 3 --

11-10014
11-10015
11-10016
11-10088 & 11-10149 2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE LAMARR GANAWAY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 11-10016
D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00332-JCM-
GWF
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHARON HAMPTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Nos. 11-10088
11-10149
D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00316-JCM-
GWF
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding

-- 2 of 3 --

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
11-10014
11-10015
11-10016
11-10088 & 11-10149 3
Submitted February 21, 2012**
Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, the United States appeals the district court’s
orders denying the Government’s request for criminal forfeiture money judgments
against Shannon Parsons, Wayne Lamarr Ganaway, and Sharon Hampton, and
reducing the criminal forfeiture money judgment against Brian K. Jackson. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
In light of our holding in United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir.
2011), we vacate the district court’s orders denying the imposition of criminal
forfeiture money judgments against Parsons, Ganaway, and Hampton , and the
district court’s order reducing Jackson’s criminal forfeiture money judgment, and
we remand.
The Government’s motion to vacate and remand for further proceedings is
denied as moot.
VACATED and REMANDED.

-- 3 of 3 --