Tracy Maxxizzine Jones v. Gloria A. Henry; Attorney General of the State of California

09-15550Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit3 de fev. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRACY MAXXIZZINE JONES,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
GLORIA A. HENRY; ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondents - Appellees.
No. 09-15550
D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01067-GEB-
GGH
Eastern District of California,
Sacramento
ORDER
TRACY MAXXIZZINE JONES,
Petitioner - Appellee,
v.
GLORIA A. HENRY; ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,
Respondents - Appellants.
No. 09-16120
D.C. No. 2:05-cv-01067-GEB-
GGH
Eastern District of California,
Sacramento
Before: B. FLETCHER, TALLMAN, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
In the final two sentences of the memorandum disposition filed on
December 7, 2011, the case numbers were inadvertently reversed. We amend
those sentences to read: “With respect to the State’s appeal in No. 09-16120 the
FILED
FEB 03 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

decision of the district court is AFFIRMED. Jones’s cross-appeal in No. 09-15550
is REMANDED with instructions.” This amendment reflects the correct case
numbers for each appeal.
With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition
for rehearing. Judges Tallman and Rawlinson have voted to deny the petition for
rehearing en banc and Judge Fletcher so recommends. The full court has been
advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge requested a vote on
whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petitions for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
No further petitions for panel or en banc rehearing will be entertained.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.