Sugey Guadarrama Milagros v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SUGEY GUADARRAMA MILAGROS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-73677
Agency No. A089-091-495
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 19, 2011**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Sugey Guadarrama Milagros, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to
reopen. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
JAN 04 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-73677 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992
(9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Guadarrama Milagros’
motion to reopen because it considered the evidence submitted and acted within its
broad discretion in determining Guadarrama Milagros did not demonstrate prima
facie eligibility for the relief sought. See INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104-05
(1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie
case for the underlying relief sought). We reject Guadarrama Milagros’ contention
that the BIA failed to address any of her claims.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --