United States of America v. Michael Jerri James

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL JERRI JAMES,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-30049
D.C. No. 3:08-cr-05264-RBL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2011**
Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Michael Jerri James appeals from certain special conditions of supervised
release imposed following his 2011 revocation of supervised release. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
OCT 28 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-30049 2
James contends that the district court erred by imposing special conditions of
supervised release relating to searches and financial disclosure because those
conditions were not included in his original sentence for the underlying crime. The
district court did not abuse its discretion. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d), (e); United
States v. King, 608 F.3d 1122, 1130-31 (9th Cir. 2010). The challenged conditions
were reasonably related to the sentencing goals of deterrence and protection of the
public, and James has not shown that they involve a greater deprivation of liberty
than is reasonably necessary. See United States v. Blinkinsop, 606 F.3d 1110,
1118-19 (9th Cir. 2010).
In his reply brief, James conceded that the other issues raised in his opening
brief are moot. Therefore, we do not address those issues.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --