Byong Seol Song, a.k.a. Byoung Song, a.k.a. Byoung Seoul Song; MI KSONG v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BYONG SEOL SONG, a.k.a. Byoung
Song, a.k.a. Byoung Seoul Song; MI K
SONG,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-73299
Agency Nos. A071-790-403
A077-166-787
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 27, 2011**
Before: SILVERMAN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Byong Seol Song and Mi K Song, natives and citizens of South Korea,
petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their
appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed
FILED
OCT 6 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

06-73299 2
by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of
fact. Kim v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1100, 1102 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and
dismiss in part the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding of removability by clear
and convincing evidence. See id. at 1103.
Petitioners lack standing to assert their equal protection contention because
“they do not belong to the class of returning [Lawful Permanent Residents] who
are allegedly similarly situated to applicants for admission.” Id. at 1104.
Petitioners’ remaining contention is not persuasive.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --