Cesar Romero v. Linda Sanders

10-56249Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit5 de out. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CESAR ROMERO,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LINDA SANDERS,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 10-56249
D.C. No. 2:07-cv-07620-VAP
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Virginia A. Phillips, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 27, 2011**
Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Cesar Romero appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we
affirm.
FILED
OCT 5 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-56249 2
Romero contends that, as part of his plea bargain, the government promised
that time served as part of a state sentence prior to being sentenced in federal court
would be credited toward his federal sentence. This contention is not supported by
the record.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.