Luis Arturo Parra Camacho, a.k.a. Luis Camacho Parra v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUIS ARTURO PARRA CAMACHO,
a.k.a. Luis Camacho Parra,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74249
Agency No. A095-660-807
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2011**
Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Luis Arturo Parra Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s order pretermitting his application for cancellation of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo
FILED
JAN 24 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74249 2
questions of law, Mercado-Zazueta v. Holder, 580 F.3d 1102, 1104 (9th Cir.
2009), and we grant the petition for review.
The BIA decided this case without the benefit of our decision in Mercado-
Zazueta v. Holder, in which we held that for purposes of satisfying the five years
of lawful permanent residence required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1), a parent’s
status as a lawful permanent resident is imputed to the unemancipated minor
children residing with that parent. 580 F.3d at 1113. Accordingly, we grant the
petition for review and remand to the BIA for further proceedings. See INS v.
Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16 (2002) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --