United States of America v. Segrria Lamose Broome

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SEGRRIA LAMOSE BROOME,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 10-50165
D.C. No. 5:06-cr-00109-RT
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Robert J. Timlin, Senior District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Segrria Lamose Broome appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed upon
revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and we affirm.
FILED
JAN 05 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-50165 2
Broome contends that the sentence was substantively unreasonable because,
among other things, the district court did not give sufficient weight to his mental
illness. The record reflects that the district court considered Broome’s arguments
and provided a reasoned basis for the sentence. In light of the totality of the
circumstances, the district court’s sentence within the Guidelines range is
substantively reasonable. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir.
2008) (en banc). Moreover, the district court did not procedurally err. See id.
Broome’s request to correct the caption to reflect that his first name is
spelled “Segrria” rather than “Seggria” is granted.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --