Santos Raul Alvarenga- Alvarado v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANTOS RAUL ALVARENGA-
ALVARADO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-74055
Agency No. A098-854-725
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 14, 2010 **
San Francisco, California
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Santos Raul Alvarenga-Alvarado, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals which
FILED
DEC 29 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 3 --

09-74055 2
dismissed his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for
asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture.
We reject Alvarenga-Alvarado’s claim that he is eligible for asylum based
on his membership in a particular social group, namely persons who fear gang
activity. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir. 2008).
Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
petitioner has not established it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or
with the acquiescence of the El Salvador government. See Santos-Lemus, 542 F.3d
at 748.
We reject petitioner’s due process claim because the BIA provided sufficient
reasons for affirming the IJ, and there was no due process violation. See Lopez v.
Ashcroft, 366 F.3d 799, 807 n.6 (9th Cir. 2004).
We lack jurisdiction to consider Alvarenga-Alvarado’s remaining
contentions - that he is entitled to asylum and withholding relief based on imputed
anti-gang political opinion, and he is a member of a social group composed of
individuals who suffer persecution by gangs due to former military service -
because Alvarenga-Alvarado failed to raise those claims before the agency, and

-- 2 of 3 --

09-74055 3
therefore he did not exhaust the claims. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678
(9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

-- 3 of 3 --