United States of America v. WAI LEUNG CHU, AKA Paul Chu

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WAI LEUNG CHU, AKA Paul Chu,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 08-50255
D.C. No. 2:01-cr-00720-DDP
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 14, 2010**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Wai Leung Chu appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his motion
to set a schedule of payment of restitution. At the time of Chu’s motion, he was
serving a sentence imposed in a case from a different district. The district court
FILED
DEC 27 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-50255 2
denied Chu’s motion without prejudice and indicated that Chu could bring the
matter to its attention during any revocation proceedings. Because the district
court’s dismissal order was not a final appealable order, see Disabled Rights Action
Comm. v. Las Vegas Events, Inc., 375 F.3d 861, 869-871 (9th Cir. 2004), we are
not empowered to consider this appeal. See id. at 869-70.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --