Sergio Olea Reynoso; Aurora Gonzalez Sanchez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-73021Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit23 de nov. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SERGIO OLEA REYNOSO; AURORA
GONZALEZ SANCHEZ,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-73021
Agency Nos. A095-446-783
A095-446-784
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 16, 2010**
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Sergio Olea Reynoso and Aurora Gonzalez Sanchez, natives and citizens of
Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
denying their motion to reopen proceedings due to ineffective assistance of
counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of
FILED
NOV 23 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-73021 2
discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785,
791 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA acted within its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to reopen
because petitioners did not establish that their former counsel “failed to perform
with sufficient competence.” See Mohammed, 400 F.3d at 793.
The motion to withdraw as attorney of record is granted. The Clerk shall
amend the docket to reflect that petitioners are appearing pro se, and their address
is 1016 S. Exmoor Ave., Compton, CA 90220.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.