Anastacio Fernandez-Rivas v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANASTACIO FERNANDEZ-RIVAS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71087
Agency No. A024-333-234
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 19, 2010**
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.
Anastacio Fernandez-Rivas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
OCT 25 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71087 2
§ 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Young Sun Shin v. Mukasey, 547
F.3d 1019, 1023 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
Fernandez-Rivas is bound by his attorney’s concession of removability
before the IJ, see id. at 1024, and has not asserted any other contentions on appeal.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --