Piedad Del Carmen Perez Pertuz v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PIEDAD DEL CARMEN PEREZ
PERTUZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-74821
Agency No. A074-351-894
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Piedad del Carmen Perez Pertuz, a native and citizen of Colombia, petitions
pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her
motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,
FILED
OCT 13 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-74821 2
Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for
review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Perez Pertuz’s July 3, 2008,
motion to reopen as number-barred, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (party may file
only one motion to reopen proceedings), and Perez Pertuz has not met any of the
exceptions to the number bar, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --