Godofredo Barragan Avarca; Maria D. Barragan v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GODOFREDO BARRAGAN AVARCA;
MARIA D. BARRAGAN,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-75210
Agency Nos. A076-847-295
A076-847-296
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 13, 2010**
Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Godofredo Barragan Avarca and Maria D. Barragan, natives and citizens of
Mexico, petition for review the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing
their appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We dismiss the petition
for review.
FILED
OCT 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-75210 2
In their opening brief, petitioners fail to address, and thereby waive any
challenge to, the agency’s order denying their application for cancellation of
removal. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996)
(issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening brief are waived).
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s denial of Barragan Avarca’s
request for voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); Tovar-Landin v.
Ashcroft, 361 F.3d 1164, 1166 (9th Cir. 2004).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --