Pablo Enrique Marin Rojas v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PABLO ENRIQUE MARIN ROJAS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-71500
Agency No. A099-051-138
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Pablo Enrique Marin Rojas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
JUL 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-71500 2
§ 1252. Reviewing de novo questions of law, Castillo-Perez v. INS, 212 F.3d 518,
523 (9th Cir. 2000), we deny the petition for review.
The IJ properly concluded Rojas was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of
removal because he lacks a qualifying relative. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D); see
also Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093-94 (9th Cir. 2002) (denying
cancellation of removal where alien lacked a qualifying relative).
Rojas’ remaining contentions are unavailing.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --