Emilia Hernandez De Quevedo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

08-70055Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit13 de jul. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EMILIA HERNANDEZ DE QUEVEDO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-70055
Agency No. A029-253-553
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 29, 2010**
Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Emilia Hernandez De Quevedo, a native of El Salvador and a citizen of El
Salvador and Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s decision
FILED
JUL 13 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

08-70055 2
denying her application for relief under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central
American Relief Act of 1997 (“NACARA”). We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Hernandez
De Quevedo failed to establish eligibility for relief under NACARA. See
NACARA, Pub. L. No. 105-100, § 203(a)(1), 111 Stat. 2160, 2196-97 (Nov. 19,
1997); see also Lanuza v. Holder, 597 F.3d 970, 972 (9th Cir. 2010) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.