United States of America v. Manuel Eduardo Alonso- Ochoa

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MANUEL EDUARDO ALONSO-
OCHOA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10402
D.C. No. 2:06-CR-00187-RCJ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Manuel Eduardo Alonso-Ochoa appeals from the 24-month sentence
imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
JUN 07 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

09-10402 2
Alonso-Ochoa contends that the district court erred by basing its sentencing
decision on impermissible factors. The record shows that the district court did not
rely primarily on factors that were inappropriate for consideration. See United
States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1182 (9th Cir. 2006); see also United States v.
Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007). Moreover, in light of the totality
of the circumstances, the district court’s sentence is substantively reasonable. See
United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 993 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --