Porfirio Angeles-Martinez, a.k.a. Porfirio Angelas-Martinez v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PORFIRIO ANGELES-MARTINEZ,
a.k.a. Porfirio Angelas-Martinez,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74732
Agency No. A020-566-679
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Porfirio Angeles-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
FILED
JUN 02 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-74732 2
We review de novo questions of law, Husyev v. Mukasey, 528 F.3d 1172, 1177
(9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
The record establishes that Angeles-Martinez was convicted of possession of
marijuana for sale in violation of California Health & Safety Code § 11359. See 8
U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(48)(A), 1229a(c)(3)(B)(v). The agency therefore properly
concluded that Angeles-Martinez is inadmissable under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) and ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility under section
212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or cancellation of removal. See 8
U.S.C. §§ 1182(h), 1229b(b)(1)(C).
As this conclusion is dispositive, we do not address Angeles-Martinez’s
remaining contentions.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --