Ferdinand Massie v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FERDINAND MASSIE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-73523
Agency No. A095-635-811
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Ferdinand Massie, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of
removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have
FILED
JUN 02 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-73523 2
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual
findings. Tekle v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 1044, 1051 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the
petition for review.
The record does not compel the conclusion that extraordinary circumstances
excused Massie’s untimely filed asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5);
Ramadan v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 646, 656-58 (9th Cir. 2007) (per curiam).
In his opening brief, Massie does not challenge the agency’s adverse
credibility determination, which is dispositive of his withholding of removal claim.
See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not
specifically raised and argued in an opening brief are waived). Accordingly, his
withholding of removal claim fails. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156
(9th Cir. 2003).
Further, because Massie does not challenge the agency’s adverse credibility
determination, and he does not point to any evidence in the record indicating it is
more likely than not he will be tortured if he returns to Indonesia, his CAT claim
fails. See id. at 1156-57.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --