Juan Gerardo Ramirez Mata v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JUAN GERARDO RAMIREZ MATA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-71207
Agency No. A034-486-731
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 25, 2010**
Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Juan Gerardo Ramirez Mata, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We dismiss the petition for
review.
FILED
JUN 01 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

07-71207 2
We lack jurisdiction to review Ramirez Mata’s contentions because he failed
to raise them before the BIA and, thus, failed to exhaust his administrative
remedies. See Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930-31 (9th Cir. 2004) (“A
petitioner cannot satisfy the exhaustion requirement by making a general challenge
to the IJ’s decision, but, rather, must specify which issues form the basis of the
appeal.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --