09-10059•United States of America v. Jose Victor Quiroa-Arias
09-10059Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit15 de abr. de 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSE VICTOR QUIROA-ARIAS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10059
D.C. No. 2:08-CR-00435-GMS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 5, 2010**
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Jose Victor Quiroa-Arias appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-
month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
APR 15 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
09-10059 2
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Quiroa-Arias’
counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion
to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Quiroa-Arias the opportunity
to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief
has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district
court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.