07-74325•Celia Victorina Benavidez v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General
07-74325Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit14 de abr. de 2010
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CELIA VICTORINA BENAVIDEZ,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-74325
Agency No. A094-454-970
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 5, 2010**
Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Celia Victorina Benavidez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming
an immigration judge’s decision finding her removable and denying her
FILED
APR 14 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
07-74325 2
applications for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. We dismiss the
petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review Benavidez’s contentions regarding her
conviction because she failed to exhaust the contentions before the BIA. See
Figueroa v. Mukasey, 543 F.3d 487, 492 (9th Cir. 2008) (“The exhaustion doctrine
requires that the petitioner put the BIA on notice as to the specific issues so that the
BIA has an opportunity to pass on those issues.”) (internal quotations and
alterations omitted).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.