Gang Li v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
KV/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GANG LI,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-70866
Agency No. A075-708-870
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Gang Li, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal,
FILED
MAR 08 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

KV/Research 06-70866 2
and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review due process claims de novo, Larita-Martinez v.
INS, 220 F.3d 1092, 1095 (9th Cir. 2000), and we grant the petition for review.
Li contends the agency violated his right to due process by holding removal
proceedings in the absence of his retained counsel. At the time of the decisions,
the IJ and BIA did not have the benefit of our decision in Hernandez-Gil v.
Gonzales, 476 F.3d 803, 808-09 (9th Cir. 2007) (concluding that the IJ denied
petitioner’s statutory right to counsel where the IJ did not take reasonable steps to
ensure the right to counsel was honored, and that the denial of petitioner’s statutory
right to counsel prejudiced him). We therefore remand for the agency to consider
Li’s claims in light of our intervening case law.
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --