United States of America v. Juan Enrique Jimenez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NC/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN ENRIQUE JIMENEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-50337
D.C. No. 3:09-CR-00322-JM
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 16, 2010**
Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Juan Enrique Jimenez appeals from the 13-month sentence imposed
following his guilty-plea conviction for importation of marijuana, in violation of
FILED
MAR 02 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

NC/Research 09-50337 2
21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and
we affirm.
Jimenez contends that the district court clearly erred at sentencing by
denying a minor-role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. He further
contends that the district court improperly based its decision on factors unrelated to
Jimenez’s level of participation in the offense. The record reflects that the district
court considered appropriate factors when determining whether Jimenez met his
burden of proving that he was a minor participant in the offense, and that it did not
clearly err by concluding that Jimenez had not met his burden. See United States v.
Cantrell, 433 F.3d 1269, 1282-83 (9th Cir. 2006); United States v. Pena-Gutierrez,
222 F.3d 1080, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2000).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --