Jesus Alberto Garcia Lopez; Martha Maria Garcia v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
IH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESUS ALBERTO GARCIA LOPEZ;
MARTHA MARIA GARCIA,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-72241
Agency Nos. A097-854-079
A097-854-120
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 10, 2010**
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Jesus Alberto Garcia Lopez and Martha Maria Garcia, natives and citizens of
Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)
FILED
JAN 21 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

IH/Research 07-72241 2
order denying their motion to reopen and reconsider. Our jurisdiction is governed
by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s March 8, 2007, order dismissing
petitioners’ appeal from an immigration judge’s order denying their application for
cancellation of removal. See Singh v. INS, 315 F.3d 1186, 1188 (9th Cir. 2003).
The petition for review is timely only as to the BIA’s May 11, 2007, order
denying petitioners’ motion to reopen and reconsider. In their brief, petitioners fail
to address this order and waive any challenge to it. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,
94 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in
a party’s opening brief are waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --