Guadalberto Virgilio Rojas- Santos; v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jlf/Inventory
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUADALBERTO VIRGILIO ROJAS-
SANTOS; et al.,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-72598
Agency Nos. A077-294-978
A077-294-979
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 11, 2010 **
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Guadalberto Virgilio Rojas-Santos, and Guadalupe Isabel Santos-Ambrosio,
petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals
FILED
JAN 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

jlf/Inventory 08-72598 2
denying their second motion to reopen the underlying denial of their application
for cancellation of removal based on their failure to establish the requisite hardship
to their qualifying United States citizen children.
Petitioners do not raise any arguments concerning the BIA’s denial of their
second motion to reopen as being untimely and numerically barred, and therefore
petitioners have waived any challenge to that decision. See Martinez-Serrano v.
INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued
in a party’s opening brief are waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --