Martha Alvarado; Martha Angelica Alvarado v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this is case suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
JTK/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARTHA ALVARADO; MARTHA
ANGELICA ALVARADO,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-75546
Agency Nos. A095-198-530
A095-448-771
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted January 11, 2010**
Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Martha Alvarado (“Alvarado”) and her daughter Martha Angelica Alvarado,
natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration
FILED
JAN 19 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

JTK/Research 06-75546 2
Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen. We dismiss the petition
for review.
The evidence petitioners presented with their motion to reopen concerned
the same basic hardship grounds as Alvarado’s application for cancellation of
removal. See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 602-03 (9th Cir. 2006). We
therefore lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that the
evidence was insufficient to establish a prima facie case of hardship. See id. at
601.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --