Ofelia Medrano Wamea v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
IH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OFELIA MEDRANO WAMEA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-73646
Agency No. A075-719-852
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 15, 2009**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.
Ofelia Medrano Wamea, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reconsider. We review for abuse
FILED
DEC 30 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

IH/Research 06-73646 2
of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida, 311 F.3d 960, 964
(9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition for review.
The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Medrano Wamea’s
motion to reconsider because the motion was untimely and failed to specify error
in the IJ’s removal order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(1), (2).
To the extent Medrano Wamea seeks an extension of her voluntary departure
period, the request is denied. See Zazueta-Carrillo v. Ashcroft, 322 F.3d 1166,
1172 (9th Cir. 2003); see also Garcia v. Ashcroft, 368 F.3d 1157, 1159 (9th Cir.
2004) (order).
Medrano Wamea’s remaining contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --