United States of America v. Delores Enos

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
EH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DELORES ENOS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-10024
D.C. No. 2:07-cr-01222-NVW
MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Neil V. Wake, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Delores Enos appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion to
modify a condition of probation that prohibits her from having contact with
FILED
DEC 14 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

EH/Research 09-10024 2
children under the age of 13 without prior permission from the court. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Enos contends that the district court erred by declining to modify the
condition of probation because the condition is different from that to which the
parties stipulated in her Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement. The district court did not
err in denying Enos’ motion to modify the conditions of her probation. See 18
U.S.C. § 3563(c).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --