Victor Manuel Vargas- Plancarte v. ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without**
oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
IH/Research
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS-
PLANCARTE,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 07-72071
Agency No. A093-178-451
MEMORANDUM *
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 17, 2009**
Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
Victor Manuel Vargas-Plancarte, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his
motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We
FILED
DEC 08 2009
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

IH/Research 07-72071 2
review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Oh v. Gonzales,
406 F.3d 611, 612 (9th Cir. 2005), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Vargas-Plancarte’s motion
to reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of law or fact in the
BIA’s December 8, 2006, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).
Vargas-Plancarte’s remaining contentions lack merit.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --