Brian Ridenour v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp.

United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 12-1139
___________
Michael B. Woolman, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
State of Nebraska; Jon Bruning, *
Attorney General for Nebraska, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 30, 2012
Filed: May 3, 2012
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, Michael Woolman appeals
the district court’s preservice dismissal of his complaint without prejudice. Upon1
careful de novo review, we find no basis for reversal. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d
1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review); see also Stone v. Harry,
364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (while pro se complaint should be liberally
The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, Chief Judge, United States District Court1
for the District of Nebraska.

-- 1 of 2 --

construed, it still must allege facts to support claims advanced; court will not supply
facts or construct legal theory for plaintiff).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Woolman’s
pending motion to compel discovery.
______________________________
-2-

-- 2 of 2 --