10-2131•United States v. William Mefford
10-2131Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit30 de mar. de 2012
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 11-2774
___________
Collin Myrlie, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Countrywide Bank; Countrywide Home *
Loans, a subsidiary of Bank of America * [UNPUBLISHED]
(f/k/a Countrywide Financial *
Corporation) Headquarters in Calabasas *
CA, USA, a New York Corporation, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 22, 2012
Filed: March 27, 2012
___________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Collin Myrlie appeals from the order of the District Court 1 denying his motion
filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking relief from the
adverse grant of summary judgment on his complaint against the mortgage company
and bank involved in the foreclosure sale of his home. Following careful review, we
1The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-- 1 of 2 --
see no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s conclusion that Myrlie did not
present newly discovered evidence or exceptional circumstances warranting relief.
See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied,
534 U.S. 975 (2001); see also Harley v. Zoesch, 413 F.3d 866, 871 (8th Cir. 2005)
(“Relief is available under Rule 60(b)(6) only where exceptional circumstances have
denied the moving party a full and fair opportunity to litigate his claim and have
prevented the moving party from receiving adequate redress.”); Alpern v. UtiliCorp
United, Inc., 84 F.3d 1525, 1536–37 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that where Rule 60(b)(2)
relief was sought based on evidence discovered after a hearing on a summary
judgment motion but before the court granted the motion, a party must have a
justifiable excuse for not timely opposing the motion for summary judgment and must
show that the evidence probably would have produced a different result).
Accordingly, we affirm.
______________________________
-2-
-- 2 of 2 --
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.